The future of code is no code

The future of coding is no coding at all.” - Chris Wanstrath, CEO at GitHub.

Coding is my bread and butter, so what this means? Am I becoming obsolete? Or maybe there will be no next generation of programmers?

I think Chris Wanstrath said this because he is also concerned. Github is the largest repository of code, so he needs to find a new purpose for Github when there won’t be much code left to be put in the repository.

What is no code?

No code software means one can create the software he needs without any coding. There is also a low-code variant that implies a small amount of coding. The idea itself is amazing: everyone can create software without doing any programming.

Setting up a site a Carrd

Every little shop can have an e-commerce website, every business a smartphone app, every enterprise it’s complex and customized software. All without any code and without any programmer involved.

So how this works? If I’m a little shop somewhere and I need a website what I do?

The most beautiful thing will be that I will not have to care about security issues (software vulnerabilities will be patched automatically), runtime issues (servers will scale to accommodate traffic spikes), accessibility issues(will work in all browsers, with or without JavaScript, sematic HTML will be used) or any other possible issue.

Everything will just work.

The only little problem will be that all websites will look and feel the same. We won’t have much room for deep personalization or unique identity.

The first and most important reason no code is so popular is that today great programming is expensive, time-consuming, and (I might add) scarce.

The second reason is that, as a non-technical person, you don’t know what programmers to choose, what database you need, what servers you need, and so on. It’s much easier to choose an out-of-the-box working solution like the one no code can provide.

The third reason is that no code software can become optimized and bullet-proof, thus a more viable alternative to re-implementing the same similar software many times, each implementation of different quality.

Will no code win?

I think it will eventually.

In my opinion, no code needs a great AI. No code is just a collection of preexisting components(standalone pieces of software) combined in a certain way. But it needs a ton of components to be useful and allow personalization.

Going back to the website example: If there are just ten or twenty templates to choose from, that won’t allow a website to be very different from others. But each website wants to be different and unique. And so wants each brand and business. For this, we need a lot of components to choose from. In fact, we need so many components that it would be tedious to find the right one.

That is why we would need an API that could select them for us and combine them in an optimal way.

Imagine you’re one of the Mars colonists, and you need a piece of software that is unique to your needs there - something that nobody on Earth thought about - and of course there are no programmers on Mars. Your only chance is a no code software created by an AI.

Should I stop coding because no code is the future?

No. We don’t know when no code will win. Or even if it will win.

Just think about it, we still write code letter by letter like we did in 1950. It’s incredibly tedious, it’s unbelievable we still do it in the same way in 2021. There must be a better way but we didn’t find it yet.

Quartz Composer

Maybe no code is that new way. Apple’s Quartz Composer was one of the first popular examples of no code programming but for some reason, it’s gone today. The successor, Facebook’s Origami studio is still used, but I don’t know how popular it is. But in both cases, the user must know all available components and what they can do. So the user is a kind of programmer, it technical.

So, for now, we’ll just keep coding. Even no code needs components that have to be coded by somebody. So, we programmers, we’ll still be busy.

Conclusion

I believe no code is the future. The current way of making software by writing code letter by letter is just not good enough. The time lost on all the typing, code surfing, and debugging is just too much today. We need something better.

There’ll still be a need for programmers in a no code world. But maybe those will more efficient or maybe just happier.

Want to learn more?